2016年7月29日 星期五

下一波高教海嘯成形:機器人時代

下一波高教海嘯成形:機器人時代

2016-07-29 03:33 聯合報 劉維公(東吳大學社會學系副教授)


在今年四月的時候,荷蘭阿姆斯特丹展出一幅「林布蘭」最新的人像畫油畫作品。林布蘭,被世人讚譽為荷蘭最偉大的畫家,是十七世紀的藝術家。在去世將近三百五十年之後的今天,怎麼可能會有他「新」的作品問世?

創作這幅畫的當然不是林布蘭本人,而是人工智慧。它是一項名為「下一個林布蘭」計畫的結晶。該計畫推動者是由美術館、保險、軟體、大學等組織所組成的團隊。團隊人員將林布蘭三四七幅作品輸入電腦之中,接著運用大數據分析方法,將其畫作分解成非常細的演算單位(亦即繪畫技巧),例如眼睛、頭髮等。由於具備精密的演算能力,什麼樣的創作題材都將難不倒電腦。

此次展出的中壯年男子人像畫,即是應用將近十七萬個演算單位,構成一幅高達近一點五億像素的作品。為了表現出畫布顏料的層次感,團隊特別採用3D列印技術,印出一幅有十四個層次的油畫。

機器人正在改變世界。從「下一個林布蘭」案例,我們清楚看到,甚至原本被認為是人類所獨特擁有的能力,也就是創造力,如今電腦機器也能夠做得到,儘管藝術家不一定苟同。

與機器人生活在一起,此一時代十年之內即將全面來臨。我們將會享受到機器人為人類所帶來的進步果實,包括醫療照顧、生活便利等。但,如果未做好充分準備,我們也將承擔其對社會發展所造成的嚴重衝擊。

就業機會的消失,正是其中一項極為嚴峻的威脅。為了讓人可以深刻感受此一威脅的嚴重性,我們用底下一個對比做說明:在一九九○年代,通用汽車相當風光,獲利可以達到一一○億美元,當時該公司僱用了八十四萬名員工;在今日,拉風的則是電動車製造公司特斯拉,新款Model 3開放預約前三天,全球即有超過廿七萬件訂單,其生產卻是僅靠一六○個機器人,每周組裝約四百輛汽車。

在過去,機器往往被認為只是「工具」,幫助勞動者提高生產力。如今,機器人就是「勞動者」。從藍領到白領,機器人將徹底轉化工作的性質,改寫專業的定義,以及重新分配就業機會。

長期以來,教育部一直認定少子化是危害高教生存的大海嘯。其實,真正的大海嘯,亦即機器人時代,才正在逼近中。少子化影響到各個學校的招生情形,而具有人工智慧的機器人衝擊到的是更根本的問題:大學存在的價值。

我們缺乏一個具有機器人時代意識的高等教育政策。面對與機器人競爭的挑戰,大學生能夠在學校學到未來職場上可以用到的一技之長嗎?如果大學制度與內容不改革,我們得到的一定是否定的答案。如果我們教育政策還是不斷糾纏在如何併校減校或世界排名,學位無用論將是我們不得不接受的墓誌銘。


(作者為東吳大學社會學系副教授)

2016年7月28日 星期四

The Democrats Win the Summer

The Democrats Win the Summer
David Brooks JULY 28, 2016 PHILADELPHIA —

Donald Trump has found an ingenious way to save the Democratic Party. Basically, he’s abandoned the great patriotic themes that used to fire up the G.O.P. and he’s allowed the Democrats to seize that ground. If you visited the two conventions this year you would have come away thinking that the Democrats are the more patriotic of the two parties — and the more culturally conservative.

Trump has abandoned the Judeo­-Christian aspirations that have always represented America’s highest moral ideals: toward love, charity, humility, goodness, faith, temperance and gentleness. He left the ground open for Joe Biden to remind us that decent people don’t enjoy firing other human beings. Trump has abandoned the basic modesty code that has always ennobled the American middle class: Don’t brag, don’t let your life be defined by gilded luxuries. He left the ground open for the Democrats to seize middle­class values with one quick passage in a Tim Kaine video — about a guy who goes to the same church where he was married, who taught carpentry as a Christian missionary in Honduras, who has lived in the same house for the last 24 years.

Trump has also abandoned the American ideal of popular self­-rule. He left the ground open for Barack Obama to remind us that our founders wanted active engaged citizens, not a government run by a solipsistic and self­-appointed savior who wants everything his way. Trump has abandoned the deep and pervasive optimism that has always energized the American nation. He left the ground open for Michelle Obama to embrace the underlying chorus of hope that runs through the American story: that our national history is an arc toward justice; that evil rises for a day but contains the seeds of its own destruction; that beneath the vicissitudes that darken our days, we live in an orderly cosmos governed by love.

For decades the Republican Party has embraced America’s open, future-oriented nationalism. But when you nominate a Silvio Berlusconi you give up a piece of that. When you nominate a blood­-and­-soil nationalist you’re no longer speaking in the voice of Lincoln, Theodore Roosevelt and every Republican nominee from Reagan to McCain to Romney.

Democrats have often been ambivalent about that ardent nationalistic voice, but this week they were happy to accept Trump’s unintentional gift. There were an unusually high number of great speeches at the Democratic convention this year: the Obamas, Biden, Booker, Clinton, the Mothers of the Movement and so on. These speakers found their eloquence in staving off this demagogue. They effectively separated Trump from America. They separated him from conservatism. They made full use of the deep nationalist chords that touch American hearts.

Trump has allowed the Democrats to mask their deep problems. A Democratic administration has presided over a time of growing world chaos, growing violence and growing anger. But the Democrats seem positively organized and orderly compared to Candidate Chaos on the other side.

The Sanders people have 90 percent of the Democratic Party’s passion and 95 percent of the ideas. Most Sanders people are kind­ and open­hearted, but there is a core that is corrupted by moral preening, an uncompromising absolutism and a paranoid unwillingness to play by the rules of civic life. But the extremist fringe that threatens to take over the Democratic Party seems less menacing than the lunatic fringe that has already taken over the Republican one.

This week I left the arena here each night burning with indignation at Mike Pence. I almost don’t blame Trump. He is a morally untethered, spiritually vacuous man who appears haunted by multiple personality disorders. It is the “sane” and “reasonable” Republicans who deserve the shame — the ones who stood silently by, or worse, while Donald Trump gave away their party’s sacred inheritance.

The Democrats had by far the better of the conventions. But the final and shocking possibility is this: In immediate political terms it may not make a difference. The Democratic speakers hit doubles, triples and home runs. But the normal rules may no longer apply. The Democrats may have just dominated a game we are no longer playing.


Both conventions featured one grieving parent after another. The fear of violent death is on everybody’s mind — from ISIS, cops, lone sociopaths. The essential contract of society — that if you behave responsibly things will work out — has been severed for many people. It could be that in this moment of fear, cynicism, anxiety and extreme pessimism, many voters may have decided that civility is a surrender to a rigged system, that optimism is the opiate of the idiots and that humility and gentleness are simply surrendering to the butchers of ISIS. If that’s the case then the throes of a completely new birth are upon us and Trump is a man from the future. If that’s true it’s not just politics that has changed, but the country. 

2016年7月17日 星期日

Artificial Intelligence Swarms Silicon Valley on Wings and Wheels

Artificial Intelligence Swarms Silicon Valley on Wings and Wheels
By JOHN MARKOFF JULY 17, 2016 SUNNYVALE, Calif. —

For more than a decade, Silicon Valley’s technology investors and entrepreneurs obsessed over social media and mobile apps that helped people do things like find new friends, fetch a ride home or crowdsource a review of a product or a movie. Now Silicon Valley has found its next shiny new thing. And it does not have a “Like” button. The new era in Silicon Valley centers on artificial intelligence and robots, a transformation that many believe will have a payoff on the scale of the personal computing industry or the commercial internet, two previous generations that spread computing globally.

Computers have begun to speak, listen and see, as well as sprout legs, wings and wheels to move unfettered in the world. The shift was evident in a Lowe’s home improvement store here this month, when a prototype inventory checker developed by Bossa Nova Robotics silently glided through the aisles using computer vision to automatically perform a task that humans have done manually for centuries. The robot, which was skilled enough to autonomously move out of the way of shoppers and avoid unexpected obstacles in the aisles, alerted people to its presence with soft birdsong chirps. Gliding down the middle of an aisle at a leisurely pace, it can recognize bar codes on shelves, and it uses a laser to detect which items are out of stock.

Silicon Valley’s financiers and entrepreneurs are digging into artificial intelligence with remarkable exuberance. The region now has at least 19 companies designing self­-driving cars and trucks, up from a handful five years ago. There are also more than a half­-dozen types of mobile robots, including robotic bellhops and aerial drones, being commercialized. “We saw a slow trickle in investments in robotics, and suddenly, boom — there seem to be a dozen companies securing large investment rounds focusing on specific robotic niches,” said Martin Hitch, chief executive of Bossa Nova, which has a base in San Francisco.

Funding in A.I. start­ups has increased more than fourfold to $681 million in 2015, from $145 million in 2011, according to the market research firm CB Insights. The firm estimates that new investments will reach $1.2 billion this year, up 76 percent from last year. “Whenever there is a new idea, the valley swarms it,” said Jen­Hsun Huang, chief executive of Nvidia, a chip maker that was founded to make graphic processors for the video game business but that has turned decisively toward artificial intelligence applications in the last year. “But you have to wait for a good idea, and good ideas don’t happen every day.”

By contrast, funding for social media start­ups peaked in 2011 before plunging. That year, venture capital firms made 66 social media deals and pumped in $2.4 billion. So far this year, there have been just 10 social media investments, totaling $6.9 million, according to CB Insights. Last month, the professional social networking site LinkedIn was sold to Microsoft for $26.2 billion, underscoring that social media has become a mature market sector.

Even Silicon Valley’s biggest social media companies are now getting into artificial intelligence, as are other tech behemoths. Facebook is using A.I. to improve its products. Google will soon compete with Amazon’s Echo and Apple’s Siri, which are based on A.I., with a device that listens in the home, answers questions and places e­commerce orders. Satya Nadella, Microsoft’s chief executive, recently appeared at the Aspen Ideas Conference and called for a partnership between humans and artificial intelligence systems in which machines are designed to augment humans.

The auto industry has also set up camp in the valley to learn how to make cars that can do the driving for you. Both technology and car companies are making claims that increasingly powerful sensors and A.I. software will enable cars to drive themselves with the push of a button as soon as the end of this decade — despite recent Tesla crashes that have raised the question of how quickly human drivers will be completely replaced by the technology.

Silicon Valley’s new A.I. era underscores the region’s ability to opportunistically reinvent itself and quickly follow the latest tech trend. “This is at the heart of the region’s culture that goes all the way back to the Gold Rush,” said Paul Saffo, a longtime technology forecaster and a faculty member at Singularity University. “The valley is built on the idea that there is always a way to start over and find a new beginning.”

The change spurred a rush for talent in A.I. that has become intense. “It’s ridiculous,” said Richard Socher, chief scientist at the software maker Salesforce, who teaches a course at Stanford on a machine intelligence technique known as deep learning. “The number of people trying to get the students to drop out of the class halfway through because now they know a little bit of this stuff is crazy.”

The valley’s tendency toward reinvention dates back to the region’s initial emergence from the ashes of a deep aerospace industry recession as a consumer-electronics manufacturing center producing memory chips, video games and digital watches in the mid­1970s. A malaise in the personal computing market in the early 1990s was followed by the World Wide Web and the global expansion of the consumer internet. A decade later, in 2007, just as innovation in mobile phones seemed to be on the verge of moving away from Silicon Valley to Europe and Asia, Apple introduced the first iPhone, resetting the mobile communications marketplace and ensuring that the valley would — for at least another generation — remain the world’s innovation center.

In the most recent shift, the A.I. idea emerged first in Canada in the work of cognitive scientists and computer scientists like Geoffrey Hinton, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun during the previous decade. The three helped pioneer a new approach to deep learning, a machine learning method that is highly effective for pattern recognition challenges like vision and speech. Modeled on a general understanding of how the human brain works, it has helped technologists make rapid progress in a wide range of A.I. fields.

How far the A.I. boom will go is hotly debated. For some technologists, today’s technical advances are laying the groundwork for truly brilliant machines that will soon have human-­level intelligence. Yet Silicon Valley has faced false starts with A.I. before. During the 1980s, an earlier generation of entrepreneurs also believed that artificial intelligence was the wave of the future, leading to a flurry of start­ups. Their products offered little business value at the time, and so the commercial enthusiasm ended in disappointment, leading to a period now referred to as the “A.I. Winter.”


The current resurgence will not fall short this time, said several investors, who believe that the economic potential in terms of new efficiency and new applications is strong. “There is no chance of a new winter,” said Shivon Zilis, an investor at Bloomberg Beta who specializes in machine intelligence start­ups. John Shoch, a veteran venture capitalist at Alloy Ventures in Palo Alto, Calif., said deep learning has made a difference to the potential success of A.I. companies. “You get a new set of tools that let you attack a new set of problems, which let you push the boundary out,” he said. For others, like Jerry Kaplan, who helped found two A.I. companies in the 1980s — Symantec, which became a security company, and Teknowledge, which ultimately shut down — the Valley’s new enthusiasm is troubling because it suggests an unfounded optimism similar to earlier eras in which the field overpromised and under-delivered. “Sometimes when I hang around with A.I. enthusiasts here in the valley, I feel like an atheist at a convention of evangelicals,” he said.

2016年7月8日 星期五

從英國脫歐 看反智主義與「厚」經濟的興起

從英國脫歐 看反智主義與「厚」經濟的興起
20160709
台新投信董事長吳火生

「歐盟完了,歐盟死了!」帶著喜悅又詫異的心情,英國獨立黨黨魁奈吉‧法拉吉(Nigel Farage)興奮地振臂吶喊。喜悅的是他鼓吹了17年的脫歐行動終於開花結果,詫異是因為他幾個小時前還認為留歐派會獲勝。然而,當天震驚的不只他一人,全球金融市場都驚呆了。這個超乎市場預期的結果不僅造成英鎊斷崖式的貶值,6/24當天全球股市總市值就蒸發了約3.3兆美元,遠遠超過雷曼兄弟破產時的1.7兆美元。

這次的英國退歐對於市場衝擊如此之大,是因為代表少數人智慧的「賭盤」,還有反映多數人意見的「民調」,及象徵集體智慧的「金融市場」在投票前都是反映留歐。綜觀近幾年全球政局的轉變,從美國茶黨的崛起,到歐洲極端主義的盛行,及全球民族主義和民粹主義的波濤洶湧來看,英國脫歐反映的不單只是金融市場失準,更確立了「反智主義」浪潮的趨勢。

所謂的「反智主義」(Anti-intellectualism 指的是人們對事情的判斷不是出自於理智,而是來自於激情、偏見。套用在政治上來看,當人民對於現狀不滿時,會開始表達對於政治精英的厭惡和不信任,參與投票往往只是為了出一口氣,而非做出最有利的選擇。簡單來說,「我的無知和你的智慧一樣有價值」。

反智主義在近年又逐漸興起有幾個主要原因:第一,經濟復甦不符大眾期待。2008年金融危機之後,世界各國透過了大規模的貨幣和財政撙節政策,逐漸將經濟活動拉回常軌,但隨著股市和房地產等風險資產價格的上漲,同時也造成貧富差距愈拉愈大,與經濟指標好轉型成諷刺的對比。《二十一世紀資本論》的作者湯瑪斯‧皮凱提(Thomas Piketty)就點出這個所得分配不均的現象。因此對大部分經濟情況並無改善甚至過得更糟的民眾來說,對於政府和政治人物不只灰心且懷怨在心。

其次,族群衝突加深對立。原先被視為第4波民主化的中東茉莉花革命,在陷入失序的內戰後,反而演變成為近代最大的難民危機。自2010年以來,每年皆有超過150萬的難民進入歐盟,幾年下來,對於歐洲人來說,除了工作權被外來移民搶走之外,治安也亮起了紅燈,這間接刺激了歐洲極右派政黨的快速成長。包含法國國民陣線和德國另類選擇,都以極激進排外的民族主義和民粹主義訴求獲得不少的支持。這次英國的退歐,難民議題也是導致最後選情逆轉的關鍵因素。

政黨惡鬥令人厭惡,產生情緒性投票,也是問題之一。歐巴馬上任以後的大政府主張加深了和共和黨之間的摩擦,從2012年財政懸崖危機到2013歐巴馬健保,以及去年因為墮胎議題而導致國會停擺,這些不斷地爭議都讓民眾對於政治人物感到失望。這種對於傳統精英階級的不滿以及反彈,也在這次美國總統初選徹底地展現出來,言語直白帶有民粹主義的唐諾德‧川普(Donald Trump)意外獲得許多不滿現狀的藍領階級的支持,讓今年美國總統大選增添許多變數。

反智主義還有一大風險在於它存在著「連鎖效應」,各國的非主流政治可以自我助長,甚至跨境呼應。另外一點便是「集體智慧失效」,本應是金融市場基石的集體智慧,在未來預測普選型政治投票的能力會逐漸失準,因為金融市場的主要玩家是理智的、較富裕的階層,而普選投票者卻對立端的另一階層,兩端距離太遠,使得預測的有效性大幅度降低,進而使長尾風險會更常出現,而這些因為反智主義所帶來的地緣政治風險也會增加市場的波動性。

在這樣的環境下,我們的投資策略該如何調整因應?首先,試著將資產配置多元化,透過不同區域和不同資產之間的低度關聯性,來降低單一政治/社會事件所帶來的風險,同時透過動態的調整和靈活的配置來因應變化快速的國內外情勢。再者,主動避開反智主義的熱區。目前看來,歐洲在未來幾年仍會是地緣政治風險最高的區域,包含接下來奧地利的總統大選,義大利的公投,明年法國和德國的大選,再加上英國要會如何執行退歐的流程,都為歐洲帶來很大的不確定性。

我們建議可以將資金逐漸移轉至「厚經濟」(THICK)國家:台灣(Taiwan)、香港(Hong Kong)、印度(India)、中國(China)、韓國(Korea),這些亞洲國家不僅沒有難民相關議題,政治局勢相對穩定,而且估值也相對偏低,台灣股市還有世界數一數二的高現金殖利率,在未來「負利率」越來越普遍的環境下將越發凸顯吸引力。


(工商時報)

2016年7月7日 星期四

中產階級下流化不關我的事?

中產階級下流化不關我的事?
20160707
丁學文

大家都說英國脫歐會很慘、英鎊會暴跌,大不列顛會變成小英格蘭!可是我很窮,即使利己損人,我也要賭一把,所以623日英國老百姓公投決定脫歐;大家都說罷工會被公司開除,公司形象會崩壞,很多人搭不到飛機很可憐!可是我很窮,即使利己損人,我也要賭一把,所以624日華航空服員決定罷工;大家都說這幫人不懂政治,只會口出狂言!可是我很窮,即使利己損人,我也要賭一把,所以柯P大人以及川普大亨橫空出世。這個世界瀰漫著一股不滿現狀、急思突破的怒氣,難怪最新一期經濟學人要以〈憤怒政治學〉(The politics of anger來形容現今全球反骨的現象。

曾經日不落的大不列顛,一直溫良恭儉讓的台灣,怎麼會這樣?我覺得真正原因就是大家窮怕了。看看台灣,工資20年鐵打不動,已經變成琅琅上口地理所當然,卻沒有人可以提出解決方法,愛台灣的人越來越無奈,越來越失落。原因何在?除了台灣經濟高速增長的年代不再,更因為在資本為王的時代,你不是既得利益者、富二代或官二代,你就會發現賺錢越來越難。問題是沒有可以期待的未來,沒有可以改變這種狀態的機會,曾經的激情慢慢被消磨成憤怒,終於陷入「可是我很窮,即使利己損人,我也要賭一把」的不得不。

這很奇怪,大家用著比過去更好的手機,有著比過去更夯的娛樂享受,為什麼卻有很窮的感覺?這是長期寬鬆貨幣環境下,資產畸形上漲的結果。如果你是趕上泡沫盛宴的一群,擁有不動產、有價證券,你就可以靠房價、資本利得、房租擁有穩定、不斷現金流的生活。但一般人即使工作多年,如果未持有資產,就會越來越窮。這說明什麼?說明資產比人力更值錢。人賺錢難、錢賺錢易,反映出人力資源所得回報竟然比資產低,新政府必須想方設法讓逐利資本願意追逐人才,千萬別再以台灣人才物美價廉而洋洋得意,唯有讓資本回頭爭奪人才,企業資本支出才會增加,股市動能方能重啟,人力回報一旦上升,大家就會有更多向上流動的機會。

清末,曾國藩曾說,社會大亂之前,必有三種前兆:其一是無論何事,均黑白不分。其二是善良的人越來越客氣,無用之人越來越猖狂。其三是所有問題明明嚴重惡化,卻都被合理化及默許,還以不痛不癢、莫名其妙的方式虛應一番,卻不見人願意為這艘破船補補窟窿,甚至還假裝沒有看見。憑藉台灣過去的累積,原本大家想在體制內成功,只要像狗,忠誠可靠,恪盡職守,會看家護院、保護主人就會平步青雲;想在體制外奮鬥,只要像狼一樣,靈敏快捷,願意奮鬥冒險, 就會突圍而出。在既得利益者的刻意不作為下,現在的台灣,狗不再一定有人養著,還常勞力勞心,裡外不是人。而狼再狠,面對沒有獵物的戰場,早已不再是狼和食物的較量,而是狼與狼之間的撕咬。既然體制內吃不飽還會餓肚子,體制外拚死拚活還搶不到食物,當然最後只剩哭窮及憤怒了。

日本學者Miura Atsushi在《下流社會》一書提出中產階級下流化的概念,他認為一向穩定的中產階級正在萎縮,從中產躋身上流者鳳毛麟角,淪入下流者卻源源不斷,加上網絡和社交媒體的風行,哭窮成為一種政治正確,而炫富則被集體攻擊。最後只見社會處處負面情緒,累積爆發的就是憤怒。我覺得吧,人生一世,草木一秋。大家想追求的是活得積極、向上、有樂趣的日子,沒有人喜歡生活在負面情緒、憤怒哭窮的社會。台灣已經退無可退,政府一定要創造公平環境,提供機會,讓台灣人力得到合理定價,讓大家有可以改變命運的願想。

同時,必須去除攔住年輕人中產之路的門檻,比如收入不平等、通貨膨脹、房價上漲等。簡單來說,就是要讓現在的中產階級實現人盡其才、有限收入保值增值的機會,要讓下一代有公平競爭、躋身上流的機會。人生在世,要想毫不利己,太難;只會損人不利己,太蠢。最好是人己兩利,但窮怕了,就會出現寧願利己損人,也要賭一把的怪象,這樣的台灣不會與你我無關。

(作者為創投合夥人)


(中國時報)